Difference between revisions of "GPU Performance"
Crunchycat (talk | contribs) |
Crunchycat (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
| 1784 | | 1784 | ||
| 138 | | 138 | ||
| − | | 90 | + | | 90% |
| 3.31 | | 3.31 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
| 1721 | | 1721 | ||
| 117 | | 117 | ||
| − | | 80 | + | | 80% |
| 3.77 | | 3.77 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
| 1645 | | 1645 | ||
| 105 | | 105 | ||
| − | | 70 | + | | 70% |
| 3.98 | | 3.98 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
| 1594 | | 1594 | ||
| 96 | | 96 | ||
| − | | 65 | + | | 65% |
| 4.20 | | 4.20 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
| 1544 | | 1544 | ||
| 90 | | 90 | ||
| − | | 60 | + | | 60% |
| 4.29 | | 4.29 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
| 1177 | | 1177 | ||
| 75 | | 75 | ||
| − | | 50 | + | | 50% |
| 4.08 | | 4.08 | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
| 1835 | | 1835 | ||
| 134 | | 134 | ||
| − | | 90 | + | | 90% |
| 3.46 | | 3.46 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
| 1772 | | 1772 | ||
| 117 | | 117 | ||
| − | | 80 | + | | 80% |
| 3.80 | | 3.80 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
| 1670 | | 1670 | ||
| 105 | | 105 | ||
| − | | 70 | + | | 70% |
| 4.05 | | 4.05 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
| 1620 | | 1620 | ||
| 96 | | 96 | ||
| − | | 65 | + | | 65% |
| 4.29 | | 4.29 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
| 1569 | | 1569 | ||
| 90 | | 90 | ||
| − | | 60 | + | | 60% |
| 4.42 | | 4.42 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
| 1190 | | 1190 | ||
| 75 | | 75 | ||
| − | | 50 | + | | 50% |
| 4.08 | | 4.08 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 14 April 2019
Contents
Overview
Lists GPU performance. These are data points offered by the community, and have not been verified.
| GPU | MH/s | OS | Driver | Version | Core | -bs | -tpb | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titan V | 1012 | Win10 | 398.82 | v1.0 | 1515 MHz | 240 | 1024 | ~192W |
| Titan V | 840 | Win10 | 398.82 | v1.0 | 1515 MHz | 240 | 512 | ~163W |
| 1080tiFTW3 | 870 | Win10 | 411.63 | v1.0 | 1822 MHz | 512 | 1024 | ~280W |
| 1080ti | 760 | Ubuntu 16.04 | 390.87 | v1.0 | 1544 MHz | 1024 | 1280 | ~280W |
| GTX 1060 6G | 318 | Win10 | 398.82 | v1.0 | 1822 MHz | 400 | 1024 | ~120W |
| GTX 1070 | 440 | Win10 | 416.34 | v3.5 | 1720 MHz | default | default | 90% |
| GTX 1060 | 275 | Centos 7 | v3.5 | |||||
| GTX 1080 | 650 | Win 10 | 416.16 | v3.5 | 1950 Mhz |
GTX 1070 Details/Efficiency
GTX 1070 performance for varying power limits with no core or memory frequency offsets. All tests performed in Windows 10 using driver 419.67, POW miner v3.11, -bs=240, and -tpb=1024. Power levels and frequencies were adjusted using nvidiaInspector v1.9.7.8.
An increase in memory frequency offset does not appear to make any changes to hashrate or power use. Aside from lower hashrate at very low -bs and -tpb, adjustment of -bs and -tpb also does not appear to make any changes to hashrate or power use.
| GPU | MH/s | Core (MHz) | Power (W) | Power | MH/s per W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1070 | 457 | 1784 | 138 | 90% | 3.31 |
| GTX 1070 | 441 | 1721 | 117 | 80% | 3.77 |
| GTX 1070 | 418 | 1645 | 105 | 70% | 3.98 |
| GTX 1070 | 403 | 1594 | 96 | 65% | 4.20 |
| GTX 1070 | 386 | 1544 | 90 | 60% | 4.29 |
| GTX 1070 | 306 | 1177 | 75 | 50% | 4.08 |
GTX 1070 performance for varying power limits with a +60 MHz core frequency offset. All tests performed in Windows 10 using driver 419.67, POW miner v3.11, -bs=240, and -tpb=1024.
| GPU | MH/s | Core (MHz) | Power (W) | Power | MH/s per W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1070 | 464 | 1835 | 134 | 90% | 3.46 |
| GTX 1070 | 445 | 1772 | 117 | 80% | 3.80 |
| GTX 1070 | 425 | 1670 | 105 | 70% | 4.05 |
| GTX 1070 | 412 | 1620 | 96 | 65% | 4.29 |
| GTX 1070 | 398 | 1569 | 90 | 60% | 4.42 |
| GTX 1070 | 306 | 1190 | 75 | 50% | 4.08 |
